Legal Opinion · Dissent

Britton v. Farmers Insurance Group

Montana Supreme Court

Decided April 17, 1986No. 84-322Published

1Dissent

The HONORABLE HENRY LOBLE, District Judge, sitting for MR. CHIEF JUSTICE TURNAGE,

dissenting:

I respectfully dissent. The trial judge did not consider and rule upon appellant Farmers Insurance Group’s (FIG) motion for separate trial on that motion’s merits.

The trial court was under the erroneous impression that District Judge Henson, who had previously presided in the case, had denied a cross-defense motion for separate trial. The trial judge repeatedly, during the trial, recognized that he should have severed the case. For example, he said: “THE COURT: Well, I think it’s another prime example…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Klaudt v. FlinkMontana Supreme Court · 1983
  2. State Ex Rel. Fitzgerald v. District Court of the Eighth Judicial DistrictMontana Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Monaco v. CecconiMontana Supreme Court · 1979
  4. State Ex Rel. McGinnis v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1983
  5. State Ex Rel. Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. District Court of the Sixteenth Judicial DistrictMontana Supreme Court · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API