Legal Opinion

Hess v. A. L. Ferguson Lumber Co.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 16, 1922PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.

(after stating the facts). The chancellor found that Hess purchased the materials for the construction of his house from appellees and agreed to pay for the same. This finding is in accord with the testimony of Aaderson, the manager of appellees. The materials were charged on the books to Hess by Wallace. The bookkeeper of appellees testified that Hess admitted to him that he owed the account and would pay the same as soon as he collected some money due him on the purchase price of some property he was selling.

Hess denied having agreed to pay for the materials, and is corroborated by Wallace.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Simpson v. J. W. Black Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1914
  2. Leifer Manufacturing Co. v. GrossSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910
  3. Cruce v. MitchellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1916

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Trinity Universal Insurance v. WillbanksSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1940
  2. Kull v. Dierks Lumber & Coal Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
  3. Marion MacHine Foundry & Supply Co. v. ColcordSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
  4. Brannan v. Paul Sanders & SonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API