Legal Opinion · Dissent

Roman Catholic Diocese of Lexington v. Noble

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided November 21, 2002No. 2002-SC-0659-MRPublished

1Dissent

Dissenting Opinion By

Chief Justice LAMBERT, Justice KELLER, and Justice STUMBO.

I. INTRODUCTION

We respectfully dissent from the majority opinion and would affirm the Court of Appeals decision denying the Roman Cath-ohc Diocese of Lexington’s (“Diocese’s”) petition for extraordinary relief. In our opinion, the terminal flaw in the majority opinion’s analysis is its rebanee upon an unsubstantiated assumption that the trial court’s failure to seal the stricken portions of the First Amended Complaint “could endanger ... the Diocese’s right to a fair trial.”1 Although the trial court conducted a…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Nixon v. Warner Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Nebraska Press Assn. v. StuartSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Press-Enterprise Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., County of RiversideSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Bigelow v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. In Re New York Times CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API