Legal Opinion
United States v. Real Property Known as 19026 Oakmont South Drive, Located in South Bend
District Court, N.D. Indiana
Decided June 16, 1989No. Civ. S 88-47PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
ALLEN SHARP, Chief Judge.
Defendant-claimant Phyllis Nedderman timely filed her “Motion to Alter and Amend Judgment” pursuant to Rule 59(e), Fed.R.Civ.P., on April 14, 1989, three days after judgment was entered in favor of plaintiff United States of America on its summary judgment motion. For purposes of building a complete record, this court held a hearing in open court on the Rule 59(e) motion on May 8, 1989, and held a further evidentiary hearing on May 16, 1989. Both parties have filed supplemental briefs in support of their respective positions and this court is now…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. RylanderSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Robert J. McCarthy v. John Manson, Commissioner of Corrections of the State of ConnecticutCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- Rothwell Cotton Company, a Texas Corporation v. Rosenthal & Company, a Partnership, and Fgl Commodity Services, Inc., an Iowa CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
- Keene Corp. v. International Fidelity InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1983
- American Home Assurance Company v. Glenn Estess & Associates, Inc., D/B/A Sales Consultants of BirminghamCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Commonwealth v. 502-504 Gordon StreetCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- United States v. One (1) Cessna Skyhawk Model 172M,Tail No. N73134, Serial No. 17267281District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2021