Legal Opinion
People v. English
New York Court of Appeals
Decided February 14, 1989PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Kaye, J.
A parolee’s statements to his parole officer, made while the parolee is in custody and in response to the parole officer’s questions about the parolee’s suspected involvement in a crime, are considered compelled unless preceded by Miranda warnings. Consequently, the parolee’s later statements to a police officer, made after Miranda warnings but as part of a continuous interrogation, must be suppressed at trial.
While defendant was on parole for an earlier, unrelated crime, the police began to suspect that he was involved in a *22recent burglary. A police investigator…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. ChappleNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- People v. Ronald W.(Anonymous)New York Court of Appeals · 1969
- Maiello v. NYS BD. OF PAROLENew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- People v. ParkerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- People v. ParkerNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
3Cited by17 opinions
- People v. AllsNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
- People v. BurryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- People v. OquendoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- People v. McGlothinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- People v. RamosAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.