Legal Opinion

People v. Shivers

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 24, 2002PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Since defendant made no motion to withdraw his guilty plea, *585his challenge to its voluntariness is unpreserved and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Were we to review this claim, we would find that nothing in the record casts doubt on the voluntariness of the plea. Defendant’s claim that he was entitled to be advised that his plea would result in an enhanced sentence upon conviction of a subsequent felony is without merit (People v McGrath, 43 NY2d 803; People v Hannon, 209 AD2d 319, Iv denied 85 NY2d 862; People v Blanco, 156 AD2d 264, Iv denied 75 NY2d 867).

The existing…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. BeneventoNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. People v. FordNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. People v. McGrathNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  4. People v. HannonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  5. People v. BlancoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. ParkerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API