Legal Opinion

Bellomini v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided March 16, 1925No. 4172PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

This conviction for violating the Harrison Anti-Nareotie Act was based solely on count 2 of the indictment; the other counts being withdrawn from the jury. Count 2 seems to have been intended to charge an offense under section 8 of the act (section 6287n, Comp. St.), but with some aid from section 1 as amended February 24, 1919 (section 6287g, Comp. St, Ann. Supp. 1919). The part of this count now important is quoted in the margin.1

Since section 8 denounces only possession by a person not registered, it has been well understood, since the Jin Fney Moy Case, 241 U. S. 394, 36 S. Ct. 658, 60 L.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. Jin Fuey MoySupreme Court of the United States · 1916

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Rossi v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1925
  2. Weaver v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1926
  3. Reese v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1926
  4. Fitzgerald v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API