Neumiller v. Acme Motor Car Co.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 54, Oct. T., 1911, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. Berks Co., April T., 1908, No. 15, on verdict for plaintiff in case of Blanche Neumiller v. Acme Motor Car Company. Trespass to recover damages for personal injuries. Before Endlich, P. J. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Superior Court. Verdict and judgment for plaintiff for $500. Defendant appealed.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Orlady, J.,
The defendant is a corporation, its business being the manufacture, sale, repairing, and furnishing for hire of automobiles, and in response to a telephone call from a hotel, it furnished an automobile and chauffeur for the use of the plaintiff and her friend to take a pleasure drive from Reading to Wannamaker and to return by way of Kutztown. While making this trip, an accident occurred which resulted in physical injuries to the ladies, and the damages they sustained have been ascertained by a verdict of a jury.
*185The contention of the appellant is, that under the evidence,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- McClung v. DearborneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1890
- McMahen v. WhiteSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
- Ardesco Oil Co. v. GilsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1870
- Sieb v. Central Pennsylvania Traction Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1911
- Hays v. MillarSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1870
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.