Legal Opinion

Hoffman v. Hoffman

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 10, 1970PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorris Slifkin, J.

In an action for separation, plaintiff moves for an award of temporary alimony, child support, counsel fees and exclusive possession of the marital home. Defendant cross-moves to dismiss the action because of plaintiff’s failure to serve a complaint within the statutory period set forth in section 211 of the Domestic Relations Law.

The motions are consolidated and are disposed of on the terms hereinafter set forth.

Defendant’s motion to dismiss the action is denied. Although plaintiff has technically failed to comply with the statute *246(Domestic Relations Law, § 211), it appears that said failure…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kay v. KayNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. Hickland v. HicklandNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. Benarroch v. BenarrochAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API