Legal Opinion

Ortiz v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 20, 2011No. 071762; A142229PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWollheim, J.

Plaintiff owns property including a house. Access to her property is across a bridge that she also owns. Plaintiff purchased a homeowner’s insurance policy from defendant State Farm. When the bridge collapsed, plaintiff made a claim under the policy. Defendant denied the claim, and plaintiff filed this action, seeking a declaration that the policy covers the cost of replacing the bridge. The trial court concluded on defendant’s motion for summary judgment that the collapse of the bridge is not covered under the policy, and plaintiff appeals. We affirm.

The parties’ arguments on appeal address…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hoffman Construction Co. of Alaska v. Fred S. James & Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Groshong v. Mutual of Enumclaw InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Holloway v. Republic Indem. Co. of AmericaOregon Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Holloway v. Republic Indemnity Co. of AmericaOregon Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Dewsnup v. Farmers InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 2010

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hunters Ridge Condominium Ass'n v. Sherwood Crossing, LLCCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  2. Phillips v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
  3. Colony Insurance Co. v. Victory Construction LLCDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2017
  4. Lincoln Benefit Life Company v. MatayaDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2024
  5. Nari Suda LLC v. Oregon Mutual Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2021

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API