Legal Opinion

Earl H. Akins v. United States Railroad Retirement Board

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 5, 1983No. 82-7584PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CANBY, Circuit Judge:

Earl H. Akins seeks review of a decision of the United States Railroad Retirement Board denying him unemployment benefits under the Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act, 45 U.S.C. §§ 351-67 (1976) (Act). Following his retirement from the Army, Akins began working for the Burlington Northern Railroad. Two years later, his employer reduced his hours and ultimately furloughed him. Akins then applied for benefits under the Act. The Board held that Akins’s military retirement pay was a form of “social-insurance payment” within the meaning of section 4(a-l)(ii) of the Act, 45…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Chrysler Corp. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Paul E. Lowe v. Railroad Retirement BoardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1961
  3. William John Kaiser v. Railroad Retirement BoardCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
  4. Culley v. Railroad Retirement BoardCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Mary Sue Estes v. Railroad Retirement BoardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  2. Alfonso Calderon v. United States Railroad Retirement BoardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  3. Alfonso Calderon v. United States Railroad Retirement BoardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  4. Mary Sue Estes v. Railroad Retirement BoardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  5. Mary Sue Estes v. Railroad Retirement BoardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API