Legal Opinion

Rubens v. Ludgate Hill Steamship Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 20, 1892PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Exceptions from circuit court, Hew York county. Action by Morris Rubens and Bernard Rubens against the Ludgate Hill Steamship Company, Limited, to recover damages for negligence in the transportation of certain furs. Verdict for plaintiff. Defendant moves to set aside verdict, and for new trial, on exceptions taken at the trial, and ordered to be heard in the first instance at general term. Motion granted.

Read the full summary

Exceptions from circuit court, Hew York county. Action by Morris Rubens and Bernard Rubens against the Ludgate Hill Steamship Company, Limited, to recover damages for negligence in the transportation of certain furs. Verdict for plaintiff. Defendant moves to set aside verdict, and for new trial, on exceptions taken at the trial, and ordered to be heard in the first instance at general term. Motion granted. For decision on appeal by plaintiffs from an order granting a motion to-make the complaint more definite and certain, see 2 H. Y. Supp. 30.

1Opinion of the CourtO’Brien, J.

This action was brought to recover damages to certain, cases of hatter’s fur, owned by the plaintiffs and imported by them in the defendant’s steamship the Ludgate Hill. The merchandise was shipped,at Antwerp upon the steamer. Planet, with liberty to transship at London upon any other ship belonging to or chartered by the agents of the defendant, and they were brought from London to this port in the Ludgate Hill, and entered at the customhouse under the bills of lading that were originally issued for them upon shipment on board the Planet at Antwerp. On arrival at the port of Hew York, 6 of…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Mynard v. Syracuse, Binghamton & New York RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  2. Perkins v. . the New York Central Railroad CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1862
  3. Kirkland v. . DinsmoreNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  4. Blair v. . Erie Railway CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
  5. Park v. . PrestonNew York Court of Appeals · 1888

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Wirth Limited and Hoesch Siegerlandwerke A. G. Siegen v. S/s Acadia Forest and Lash Barge No. Cg-204, Eurogulf Lines D/B/A Central Gulf Contramar LineCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
  2. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co. v. Northern Pac. R.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1903
  3. Heuman v. M. H. Powers Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API