Commonwealth v. Cotto
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
CAVANAUGH, Judge:
This appeal requires that we decide the constitutionality of certain 1995 amendments to the Juvenile Act. Specifically, we consider arguments that the provisions regarding transfer of cases from adult criminal court to juvenile court are: (1) unconstitutionally vague; and (2) unconstitutional because they place the burden of proof for transfer on the juvenile. After careful review, we conclude the amendments conform with constitutional standards and affirm appellant’s judgment of sentence.
Appellant, Abraham Martinez Cotto, was charged with six counts of armed robbery and two…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Kent v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- McKeiver v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Breed v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Commonwealth v. RiveraSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- State Ex Rel. Commissioner of Transportation v. Medicine Bird Black Bear White EagleCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2001
- Commonwealth v. CottoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- State v. ColemanSupreme Court of Kansas · 2001
- Com. v. Watts, C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2022
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.