Legal Opinion · Dissent

People v. Mayo

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 19, 1975Published

1Dissent

Fuchsberg, J. (dissenting).

The issue is whether the evidence adduced before the Grand Jury was sufficient to sustain an indictment for grand larceny second degree of defendant Ann Mayo who for eight years had been employed by the New York State Thruway Authority as a toll collector at the Tappan Zee Bridge. The County Court dismissed the indictment; the Appellate Division reinstated it by a divided court.

Cars approaching toll booths obtained passage in any of three ways: by cash, credit or commutation tickets, the last involving stubs detached from booklets when presented by motorists. For…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. . MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
  2. People v. LeyraNew York Court of Appeals · 1956
  3. People v. DunleavyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973
  4. Abrams v. Great American InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
  5. People v. DunleavyNew York Court of Appeals · 1973

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API