Legal Opinion · Dissent

Mark Z. Greenberg v. United States of America Department of the Treasury Internal Revenue Service

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided December 15, 1994No. 94-7075Published

1DissentNygaard, Circuit Judge

26 U.S.C. § 6672 provides that a person responsible for withholding and paying over taxes who willfully fails to do so is liable for a penalty equal to the total amount of the unpaid taxes. Because I think the facts of this case do not establish Greenberg’s responsibility as a matter of law, I would reverse the summary judgment of the district court. Hence, I dissent.

Responsibility under § 6672 “is a matter of status, duty or authority, not knowledge.” Quattrone Accountants, Inc. v. IRS, 895 F.2d 921, 927 (3d Cir.1990). A person is responsible within the meaning of § 6672 “if the person has…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Waymon Leon Howard v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
  2. Dudley J. Godfrey, Jr., Appellant/cross-Appellee v. United States, Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
  3. Richard L. Gephart v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
  4. Quattrone Accountants, Inc. And Philip P. Quattrone v. Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
  5. United States v. Basil Vespe, David L. Padrutt and Alex Fein, A/K/A Alex Feinman. Appeal of Basil VespeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API