Legal Opinion

Kruegel v. Williams

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 1, 1913Published

Appeal from District Court, Dallas County; Kenneth Foree, Judge. Contempt proceedings by Herman Kruegel against H. H. Williams and others to punish defendant for refusal to issue an execution on a money judgment in favor of complainant against Murphy & Bolanz. From a judgment dismissing the proceedings, complainant appeals.

1Opinion

On Motion for Rehearing.

[4] There was no brief filed in this court by appellee Our attention, for the first time, has been called by motion for rehearing to the fact that the certificate to the-transcript was made by appellee, who was. and is the clerk of the district court from which this appeal was taken. There was no clerk pro tern, appointed to act in the-case, and all the papers filed in the matter were-filed by appellee, who is the only party defendant In a proceeding where the clerk of the district court is a party to a cause, it is provided by the Statutes (article 1687, R. S. 1911…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Womack v. StokesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1895
  2. Lewis v. HutchisonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1890

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API