Legal Opinion

Perrin v. Whipple

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1909Published

Action by one Perrin against one Whipple and others. Motions to vacate orders to file bonds for costs.

1Opinion of the CourtDayton, J.

Action (apparently) brought for specific performance of contract. Defendants appeared separately, and each obtained an ex parte order directing that security for costs be filed in $250. Plaintiff makes three motions to vacate "said orders.

In Rothchild v. Wilson (Sup.) 10 N. Y. Supp. 61, Mr. Justice Lawrence held as follows:

“Where the plaintiffs are nonresidents, and there are two or more defend- • ants, they cannot appear separately and each require a bond to him as security *1049for his costs. The statute requires only one bond, which should run ‘to the defendants,’ and is for the benefit of them…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Rothchild v. WilsonNew York Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Leftwick v. ClintonNew York Supreme Court · 1863

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API