Legal Opinion

State v. Smith

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 1972No. State 63PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilkie, J.

Before reaching the issues on the merits of this appeal, it should be noted that the incorrect post-conviction procedure was utilized in this case. The procedural problem in this case is that although the sec. 974.06 motion was made before the expiration of the one-year appeal period (applicable to this case by virtue of sec. 958.13, Stats. 1967), the motion was used to raise objections not reaching the constitutional dimensions contemplated under sec. 974.06,' but stating objections that should have been covered by a motion for a new trial. In this respect we very recently stated in Peterson…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Peterson v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
  3. State v. MelvinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Holesome v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Claybrooks v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Kathleen A. Braun v. Barbara PowellCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
  2. Hagenkord v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
  3. State v. ElderCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1998
  4. State v. RedmonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1976
  5. State v. VerhasseltWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API