Legal Opinion

Gieseking v. Thomas

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Illinois

Decided January 5, 2007No. 14-30541PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND ORDER

PAMELA PEPPER, Bankruptcy Judge.

This adversary proceeding boils down to a disagreement between two former business associates as to whether one fraudulently caused — or, at least, fraudulently allowed to occur — a business loss to the other. After hearing extensive evidence at trial, the Court concludes that this case, while it results from the dashed hopes and dreams of both men, did not involve fraud, and therefore that the defendant’s debts are dischargeable under the Bankruptcy Code. 1

I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY

On January 20, 2005, plaintiff…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Grogan v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Field v. MansSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. HSSM 7 Ltd. Partnership v. BilzerianCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
  4. In the Matter of Roxolana Harasymiw, Debtor. Selfreliance Federal Credit Union, Cross-Appellant v. Roxolana Harasymiw, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
  5. In the Matter of John A. Maurice, Debtor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Buckeye Retirement Co. v. Bishop (In Re Bishop)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Alabama · 2009
  2. In re: Jon A Goldman; Robert J. Siragusa, individually and as trustee for the Robert J. Siragusa, MD Employee Benefit Trust, (formerly Dermatology Associates of Bay County, P.A., Defined Benefit Trust); Dana Siragusa, and Robert Joseph Siragusa v. Jon A. GoldmanUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API