Legal Opinion

Smith v. Rosenthall

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1855PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Motion to set aside the judgment in favor of the plaintiffs for irregularity.

1Opinion of the Court

T. R. Strong, Justice.

The principal question on this motion is, as to the sufficiency of the affidavit of verification of the complaint. If it is insufficient, the answer of the defendant, although not verified, should have been received, and the judgment entered as upon a default to answer, is irregular, and must be set aside.

The complaint is upon a promissory note, alleged to have been made by the defendant to the plaintiffs, and is wholly upon information and belief. The verification is by the affidavit of one of the attorneys of the plaintiffs, who, states, in addition to what is required…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. High Rock Knitting Co. v. BronnerNew York Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Myers v. GerritsNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1861
  3. Hecht & Co. v. FrieslebenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1888

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API