Legal Opinion

Lewis v. Ozone Waste Sales Corp.

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas

Decided January 25, 1971Published

1Opinion of the Court

GARB, J.,

— We have before us for disposition a rule secured by defendant, Ozone Waste Sales Corp. (hereinafter referred to as “Ozone”) against plaintiffs herein to show cause why a judgment entered in behalf of plaintiffs and against Ozone by default should not be stricken or opened and Ozone allowed into a defense. In view of the disposition we make thereof, it will be unnecessary for us to make any determination with regard to the rule to show cause why the judgment should not be opened.

On January 27, 1967, plaintiffs herein instituted this action against Ozone and two other named…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Tozer v. Charles A. Krause Milling Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1951
  2. Midora v. Alfieri (Et Al.)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  3. Biel v. Herman Lowenstein, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  4. Idzik v. First German Sport Club PhoenixSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  5. Charles F. Luppold, Inc. v. LivingoodSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API