Legal Opinion

Waters v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided December 18, 1928No. 1 Div. 818PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSamford, J.

The evidence for the state, without conflict tended to prove every material ingredient of the charge as laid in the indictment, and, while there was a formal plea of not guilty, the real defense was under plea 2, which was; “Not guilty by reason of insanity.” In view of this state of the record it will be unnecessary to pass upon any of the questions relating to the plea of not guilty, for the reason that, if there was technical error in any of these rulings, it'is very apparent that such rulings did not injuriously affect defendant’s case.

Dr. Hall was introduced as a witness by defendant,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Powell v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1854
  2. Beasley v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1874
  3. Wesley v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1878
  4. McNaron v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1925

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MustoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  2. Albarran v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2011
  3. Varner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1982
  4. Brackin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1982
  5. Hunt v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API