Legal Opinion

Haas, Et Ux. v. Rathburn, Et Ux.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided April 29, 1965No. 19,803Published

1Opinion

On Petition for Rehearing.

Smith, J.

The appellees. have filed their petition for rehearing consisting of five (5) specifications. The appellants, filed their motion to . dismiss, said rehearing petition on the ground that the- petition does not comply with the provision of Rule 2-22 of the Rules of the Supreme Court that:

*177“Applications for rehearing of any cause shall be made by petition, separate from the briefs . stating concisely the reasons why the decision is thought to be erroneous.” (emphasis supplied)

In Automobile Underwriters Inc. v. Smith (1961), 241 Ind. 302, 171 N. E. 2d 823, the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Automobile Underwriters, Inc. v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Haas, Et Ux. v. Rathburn, Et Ux.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API