Legal Opinion

People v. Ditto

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided October 21, 1981No. Docket 52680PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBashara, P.J.

Defendant appeals his plea-based conviction of larceny in a building, MCL 750.360; MSA 28.592.

Initially, defendant contends that the prosecutor abused his discretion by charging him under the statute prohibiting larceny in a building, a felony, rather than for simple larceny, MCL 750.356; MSA 28.588, which is a misdemeanor.

The argument lacks merit. Michigan’s appellate courts have regularly held that where an alleged defendant could have been charged under two different statutes for the same offense, it is not an abuse of discretion to charge the violation under the more harsh of the two…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re Guilty Plea CasesMichigan Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Genesee Prosecutor v. Genesee Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Genesee Prosecutor v. Genesee Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
  4. People v. SwearingtonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978
  5. People v. HuntMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. RiveraMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. People v. RushMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. People v. NicenMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. People v. McCrackenMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. People v. DittoMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API