Legal Opinion

Smith v. Smith

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 4, 1941No. Civ. 12821PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.

From a purported order denying a motion to quash a purported order authorizing the issuance of a writ of execution upon an alimony judgment after more than five years from the rendition thereof, defendant appeals.

The record discloses the following minute entries, sometimes denominated minute orders, of the trial court:

“JULY 18, 1940 Department 35

Present: HON. THOMAS C. GOULD, Presiding Judge.

PEARL B. SMITH,

vs.

Plaintiff,

VNo. D 41130

DALTON L. SMITH,

Defendant..,

“Motion of plaintiff for issuance of execution comes on for hearing, Joseph Scheeter appearing as attorney for plaintiff and C. Fetterly…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kindig v. Palos Verdes Homes Assn.California Court of Appeal · 1939
  2. Estate of YaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Pessarra v. PessarraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  2. Fox v. FoxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  3. Grattan v. SilbaughCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API