Matthews v. Wilson
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Ebbrhardt, Judge.
Matthews’ motion for summary judgment on the counterclaim should have been granted. The only matter in the record indicating any negligence on his part is Wilson’s statement in the interrogatories as to the specifications of negligence he relied upon. These, of course, are conclusions and not statements of facts. “In considering depositions and affidavits in support of or in opposition to motions for summary judgments the facts contained therein, and not the conclusions stated, determine whether a genuine issue of fact exists.” Varnadoe v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 112…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Varnadoe v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
- Patterson v. Cotton States Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1966
- Scott v. Gulf Oil CorporationCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
- White v. Augusta Motel Hotel Investment Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
3Cited by22 opinions
- Thomasson v. Trust Company BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
- Albertson v. City of JesupCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
- Land v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
- Crawford v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
- Coopers & Lybrand v. CocklereeceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.