Legal Opinion

Stolarski v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided February 19, 1958No. 29,357PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIDSON, Judge.

This is a bond forfeiture case, the appellate procedure relative to which is governed by the rule in civil cases.

Rule 414, Vernon’s Civil Procedure, requiring the filing of briefs, has not been complied with.

The motion of the state to dismiss the appeal for that reason, under Rule 415, Vernon’s Civil Procedure, is well taken. Tatum, et al, v. State, 148 Texas Cr. Rep. 425, 187 S.W. 2d 989; Gaither, et al, v. State, 156 Texas Cr. Rep. 503, 244 S.W. 2d 209; Bell, et al, v. State, 244 S.W. 2d 210.

Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gaither v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1951
  2. Bell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1951
  3. Tatum v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1945
  4. Tatum v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1945

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Price v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1993