Legal Opinion
State v. Thibodeau
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided March 23, 2000PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDana, J.
[¶ 1] Mark Thibodeau appeals from the judgment entered in the Superior Court (Aroostook County, Pierson, J.) following his conditional plea and conviction for trafficking in marijuana (Class C) in violation of 17-A M.R.S.A. § 1103. 1 On appeal, Thibodeau contends that the court erred by denying his motion to suppress because a Maine Drug Enforcement Agency (MDEA) agent obtained the evidence he sought to suppress as a result of an improper entry to his apartment. He also contends that he was subjected to a custodial interrogation without the benefit of a Miranda 2 warning. We affirm.
[¶ 2] The…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Nix v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Murray v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- United States v. Bernard Michael McLaughlin United States of America v. David Carl BruceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. RabonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2007
- State v. DrewrySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2008
- State v. HigginsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2002
- Bean v. CummingsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2008
- Alexandre v. StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2007
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.