Legal Opinion

Moore 174138 v. Howard

District Court, W.D. Michigan

Decided October 31, 2023No. 2:23-cv-00131Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ______ THOMAS MOORE, Petitioner, Case No. 2:23-cv-131 v. Honorable Maarten Vermaat JEFF HOWARD, Respondent. ____________________________/ OPINION This is a habeas corpus action brought by a state prisoner under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) and Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Petitioner consented to proceed in all matters in this action under the jurisdiction of a United States magistrate judge. (Pet., ECF No. 1, PageID.25.) Section 636(c) provides that “[u]pon the consent of the…

2Cases cited100 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Coppedge v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Miller-El v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003

95 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API