Legal Opinion

Winkle v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 24, 1982No. 82-171PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOBSON, Judge.

John Grant Winkle appeals an order of the trial court adjudicating him guilty of petit theft,1 withholding imposition of sentence and placing him on six months probation on condition that he serve the maximum sixty-day jail term for the petit theft conviction. We reverse the split sentence probation alternative.2

Our supreme court held in State v. Holmes, 360 So.2d 380 (Fla.1978), that the combined periods of incarceration and probation imposed as a “true” split sentence alternative3 must be within the maximum period of incarceration provided by the statute for the offense…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Villery v. Florida Parole & Probation Com'nSupreme Court of Florida · 1981
  2. State v. HolmesSupreme Court of Florida · 1978

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
  2. Smith v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  3. Grant v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API