Legal Opinion

Harris v. . Wright

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 5, 1896PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Civil aotioN, tried before Stariuelc, J., at January, 1896, .Special Term of Person Superior Court. A jury trial having been waived, his Honor found the facts, the material parts of which are set out in the opinion of Associate Justice Montgomery. His Honor rendered judgment for the defendants and plaintiff appealed.

1Opinion of the Court

Montgomery, J.:

In his last will and testament James H. Harris devised a tract of land of twelve hundred acres to his widow for her life, with remainder in fee to his nephew, Thomas D. Wright, the defendant in this action, but charged it with an interest in favor of Jesse Harris and Henry Harris, the last named being the plaintiff in this action, as follows: “However, I request that Jesse and Henry Harris', former slaves of mine, remain with my wife and nephew until the death of my wife, and if they shall remain with them during that time that they, Jesse and Henry, shall have at some suitable…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Jones v. . CohenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1880
  2. Parker v. . AllenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
  3. Wright v. . HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Commercial National Bank of Charlotte v. Charlotte Supply Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  2. Harwood v. Shoe.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  3. Burch v. . BushSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  4. Lange v. Houston Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1946
  5. Norcross v. B. L. Roberts Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API