Hydraulic Press Manufacturing Co. v. Commissioner
United States Tax Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION.
Arundell, Judge:
The petitioner claims relief under section 722 (b) (4), Internal Eevenue Code of 1939, because of changes in its products, an increase in its capacity for production or operation for which it was committed prior to January 1, 1940, and a change in the ratio of nonborrowed capital to total capital.
As to the changes in products, the petitioner claims that during or just prior to the base period it developed and began manufacturing several new products, including the hydropower radial pump, pressure generators, valves, controls, and other accessories, Guerin process…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. Memphis Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
- United States v. KalesSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Angelus Milling Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Tucker v. AlexanderSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- United States v. Garbutt Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- The Crowell-Collier Publishing Company v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1958