Legal Opinion

Evans v. Scanson and Peters

Montana Supreme Court

Decided June 27, 2017No. DA 16-0363PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McKINNON

¶1 Kerrie Evans (Evans) appeals from a jury verdict after a nine-day trial in the Eighteenth Judicial District Court that found Peggy Scanson (Scanson) and William Peters, M.D. (Dr. Peters) did not deviate from the standard of care when providing Evans with prenatal care. Evans seeks a new trial or amended judgment based on our disposition of the following issues:

1. Whether the District Court erred by admitting collateral source testimony under the rule of curative admissibility.

2. Whether the District Court abused its discretion by ruling expert testimony was within the scope of its…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States v. Jerry Alfred WhitworthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  2. State v. FavelMontana Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Lopez v. JosephsonMontana Supreme Court · 2001
  4. McDermott v. CARIE, LLCMontana Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Hawkins v. HarneyMontana Supreme Court · 2003

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Mont. State Univ.-Bozeman v. Mont. First Judicial Dist. CourtMontana Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Covey v. BrishkaMontana Supreme Court · 2019
  3. State v. C. ByrneMontana Supreme Court · 2021
  4. Steffensmier v. HuebnerMontana Supreme Court · 2018
  5. Murray v. SteinmetzMontana Supreme Court · 2026

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API