Legal Opinion

Banks v. Uhl

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1876PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error from the district court of Nemaha county. Motion made by defendant in error to dismiss proceedings.

1Opinion of the Court

Lake, Ch. J.

This is a motion to quash the proceedings in error, and to strike the case from the docket for the reason, as is alleged, that a final judgment has not yet been rendered in the district court.

In making this motion, the defendant in error proceeds upon the theory that where the judgment of a justice of the peace is taken on error to the district court, and reversed, and the original cause is retained and set down for trial in that court, as the statute directs, the judgment of reversal cannot be reviewed by this court until after a final trial and judgment is had on the original…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Rohde v. Farmers Alliance Mutual InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Ribble v. FurminNebraska Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Hansen v. BergquistNebraska Supreme Court · 1879
  4. Tootle, Hosea & Co. v. JonesNebraska Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Dane County Bank v. GarrettNebraska Supreme Court · 1896

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API