Legal Opinion

Noble v. Butler

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 15, 1881PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error from Shawnee District Court. Injunction, brought by Noble against Butler and others, to perpetually enjoin the collection of the remainder due on a certain judgment. The nature of the action, and the facts, appear in the opinion. Judgment for the defendants, at the May Term, 1880, of the district court. Noble brings the case here.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

VALENTINE, J.:

This was an action brought by George M. Noble against Janet Butler and W. X). Disbrow, sheriff of Shawnee county, Kansas, to perpetually enjoin the collection of a balance due on a certain judgment, rendered in favor of Mrs. Butler, and against the plaintiff and others. The facts of the case appear to be substantially as follows:

In March, 1873, the plaintiff Noble and the defendant Mrs. Butler resided in Topeka, Kansas. Mrs. Butler had money which she desired to loan, and Noble acted as her agent and attorney in loaning and collecting the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mehnert v. ThiemeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1875
  2. Sweet v. HentigSupreme Court of Kansas · 1880
  3. Cole v. WalkerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1871
  4. Tutt v. FergusonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1874

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Rounsaville v. HazenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1885
  2. Butler v. CraigSupreme Court of Kansas · 1883
  3. Lindsey v. Southern Pacific Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API