Legal Opinion

Vaughn Usher v. Nipro Diabetes Systems, Inc., and Nipro Medical Corporation

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 24, 2016No. 4D14-4766PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

We reverse the order dismissing Vaughn Usher’s various complaints with prejudice for failure to state causes of action. The pleadings attempted to state claims under Florida’s whistleblower act and for age discrimination under Florida’s Civil Rights Act of 1992.

Section 448.102(3), Florida Statutes (2009) precludes an employer from taking “any retaliatory personnel action against an employee because the employee has objected to, or refused to participate in, any activity, policy, or practice of the employer which is in violation of a law, rule, or regulation.” “ ‘Law, rule, or regulation’…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Barbara Kragor v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2012
  2. Aery v. Wallace Lincoln-Mercury, LLCDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
  3. Gleason v. ROCHE LABORATORIES, INC.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2010
  4. Rivera v. Torfino Enterprises, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Graddy v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LPDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2017
  2. Lin v. DemingsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
  3. Bardram v. Oak Hill Health and Rehabilitation, LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2025
  4. Gessner v. Southern Company and Gulf Power CompanyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2024
  5. LE PUBLICATIONS, INC. v. RANDALL KOHLDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API