Legal Opinion

Born v. Exxon Corp.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided September 26, 1980No. 79-166PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The appeal is from a summary judgment granted in favor of the appellee, Exxon Corporation, in a suit by appellant, Faye Ward Born, who sought damages for an alleged interference with her property caused by Exxon's operation of a treating facility. The trial court granted Exxon's motion for summary judgment on the theory that the property owner's action was barred by the statute of limitations, specifically, Code 1975, § 6-2-39 and §6-5-127 (a).

The only issue raised on appeal is whether the property owner's action against Exxon is barred by the statute of limitations.

Appellant contends that…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Borland v. Sanders Lead Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1979
  2. Rushing v. Hooper-McDonald, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1974

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Brown v. Scioto Cty. Bd. of Commrs.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. Bradley v. American Smelting and Refining Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Maddy v. Vulcan Materials Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 1990
  4. Maryland Heights Leasing, Inc. v. Mallinckrodt, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. W.T. Ratliff Co., Inc. v. HenleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1981

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API