Born v. Exxon Corp.
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
The appeal is from a summary judgment granted in favor of the appellee, Exxon Corporation, in a suit by appellant, Faye Ward Born, who sought damages for an alleged interference with her property caused by Exxon's operation of a treating facility. The trial court granted Exxon's motion for summary judgment on the theory that the property owner's action was barred by the statute of limitations, specifically, Code 1975, § 6-2-39 and §6-5-127 (a).
The only issue raised on appeal is whether the property owner's action against Exxon is barred by the statute of limitations.
Appellant contends that…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Borland v. Sanders Lead Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1979
- Rushing v. Hooper-McDonald, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1974
3Cited by22 opinions
- Brown v. Scioto Cty. Bd. of Commrs.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1993
- Bradley v. American Smelting and Refining Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1985
- Maddy v. Vulcan Materials Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 1990
- Maryland Heights Leasing, Inc. v. Mallinckrodt, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1985
- W.T. Ratliff Co., Inc. v. HenleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.