Legal Opinion · Concurrence

S.P.M. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 15, 2011No. 2D10-2415Published

1ConcurrenceCasanueva, C.J.

I concur in the affirmance only because binding case law mandates the result. However, I write to express my concern that our case law deviates from the plain meaning of the legislature’s words in section 784.011(1), Florida Statutes (2009).

Among other offenses, the trial court adjudicated S.P.M. delinquent on count four in the petition for delinquency, a charge of aggravated assault. The criminal episode resulting in these proceedings involved a moment of road rage where a number of men all exited their vehicles at an intersection and confronted each other. At some point, S.P.M. wielded a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. WhiteSupreme Court of Florida · 1975
  2. Gilbert v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
  3. McClain v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
  4. Biggs v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
  5. Johnson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API