Legal Opinion

Sweet v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided January 8, 1930No. 12745Published

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion

A proper recognizance having been brought forward, the appeal is reinstated, the judgment of dismissal set aside and the case considered on its merits.

The state relied upon circumstantial evidence. Appellant did not testify in his own behalf, and he placed no witnesses on the stand. In his argument to the jury, after summing up the circumstances relied upon by the state, one of counsel for the state used language as follows:

"Those are the facts before you, gentlemen of the jury, and they are not disputed. There is no denial of any kind."

Counsel for appellant promptly objected to the remarks.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Traylor v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1928
  2. Boles v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1928
  3. Pirtle v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1928
  4. Boles v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API