Legal Opinion

Williams v. North Carolina

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 21, 1945No. 84PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court 1

325 U.S. 226 (1945)

WILLIAMS ET AL.

v.

NORTH CAROLINA.

No. 84.

Supreme Court of United States.

Argued October 13, 1944.

Decided May 21, 1945.

CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA.

Mr. W.H. Strickland for petitioners.

Hughes J. Rhodes, Assistant Attorney General of North Carolina, with whom Harry McMullan, Attorney General, and Mr. J.E. Tucker were on the brief, for respondent.

2Opinion of the Court · FrankfurterJustice Frankfurter

This case is here to review judgments of the Supreme Court of North Carolina, affirming convictions for bigamous cohabitation,[1] assailed on the ground that full faith and credit, as required by the Constitution of…

Also in this document: Concurrence; Dissent · Rutledge; Dissent · Black.

3Cases cited103 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  4. Lanzetta v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  5. Chicot County Drainage District v. Baxter State BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1940

98 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hamilton v. HamiltonOhio Court of Appeals · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API