Legal Opinion

Carmack v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided May 8, 1962No. 3 Div. 114PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CATES, Judge.

This is a habeas corpus appeal. See also Ex parte Carmack, ante, p. 426, 133 So.2d 891.

Carmack alleged numerous grounds. However, he made no proof.

The return of the prison warden shows a proper indictment, verdict, judgment and sentence from the Jefferson Circuit Court.

Code 1940, T. 15, § 27, reads in part:

“No court, or judge, on the return of a writ of habeas corpus, has authority to inquire into the regularity or justice of, any order, judgment, decree, or process of any court legally constituted, ^ ^ ”

The circuit court has jurisdiction of trials of indictments for carnal…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ex parte CarmackAlabama Court of Appeals · 1961

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ex parte CarmackSupreme Court of Alabama · 1963
  2. Carmack v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API