Legal Opinion

United States v. Mohamud

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided April 22, 2013No. Criminal Case No. 3:10-CR-00475-KIPublished

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

KING, District Judge.

A jury convicted defendant Mohamed Osman Mohamud of attempting to use a weapon of mass destruction, specifically a destructive device or explosive bomb, against a person or property within the United States, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2332a(a)(2)(A). Before the court are defendant’s Motion for Judgment of Acquittal After Jury Verdict [431] and Motion for a New Trial [432]. I deny both motions for the reasons stated below.

LEGAL STANDARDS

I. Motion for Judgment of Acquittal

In determining if sufficient evidence exists to support a verdict, the court

must…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Washington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Old Chief v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Sherman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  5. United States v. SchefferSupreme Court of the United States · 1998

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API