Sowell v. London Assur. Corporation
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
This is an appeal from a judgment and order denying a new trial in an action to recover upon an insurance policy, in which action the plaintiff prevailed.
The complaint in the case alleged that one W. E. Beeson was the owner of the land and buildings insured at the time of the issuance of the policy thereon, and that subsequently thereto said W. E. Beeson sold, assigned, transferred, and set over to the plaintiff all of his interest in the property, and that said W. E. Beeson shortly after said transfer also assigned and transferred to plaintiff all of his interest in and to said…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Raulet v. Northwestern Nat'l Ins. Co. of MilwaukeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- Bennett v. Union Central Life InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1903
- Phenix Insurance Co. v. GroveIllinois Supreme Court · 1905
3Cited by2 opinions
- Bennett v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Curran v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925