Legal Opinion

Union Products Co. v. Spindler

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided January 25, 1919No. 9,682PublishedCited by 1 opinion

From DeKalb Circuit Court; Alphonso G. Wood, Special Judge. Action by Union Products Company against George J. Spindler, who counterclaimed. From a judgment against plaintiff "and in favor of defendant on his counterclaim, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtRemy, J.

This is an action by appellant on account for paint sold and delivered to appellee. Answers filed by appellee pleaded failure of consideration and breach of warranty. Appellee also filed a counterclaim charging breach of warranty, and asking damages for services and expenses in spreading the worthless paint. The court by a special finding of facts and conclusions of law found against appellant, and *271for .appellee on Ms counterclaim. Exceptions to the conclusions of law present the only questions for review.

The facts found by the trial court which are material for the purpose of this appeal are…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Glucose Sugar Refining Co. v. Climax Coffee & Baking Powder Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1907

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Mid-City Iron & Metal Co. v. TurnerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API