Legal Opinion
Day v. Mountin
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided April 4, 1905No. 2,119PublishedCited by 4 opinions
Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Minnesota.
1Opinion of the Court
RINER, District Judge.
This is a bill in equity brought by appellant (complainant below) to enforce specific performance of a contract to purchase two hundred and sixty (260) acres of land situate in Blue Earth county, Minn.
The contract is in the following words, to wit:
“Tips agreement, Made and entered into this 21st day of March, A. D. 1902, by and between Frank Day of Hartford, Wis., party of the first part, and William Mountin, Jr., party of the second part, Witnesseth: That the said party of the first part, in consideration of the covenants and agreements of said party of the second part,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Cornelius v. KesselSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Morgan's Heirs v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1817
- Easton v. MontgomeryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Dresel v. JordanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
- Fenn v. HolmeSupreme Court of the United States · 1859
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Chandler v. GaultWisconsin Supreme Court · 1923
- Alpha Portland Cement Co. v. ShirkCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1915
- Ward v. PearsallCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1925
- San Mateo Land Co. v. ElemCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1923