Legal Opinion
Froehlich v. Sheehan
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided December 8, 1992No. 1-91-1751, 1-91-3202 consPublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice DiVITO
Plaintiff Edwin C. Froehlich filed a claim on behalf of the estate of Paul Edwards. As respondents in discovery, pursuant to section 2 — 402 of the Code of Civil Procedure (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1989, ch. 110, par. 2 — 402), he named Joseph C.M. Sheehan; Joseph C.M. Sheehan, M.D., S.C., Sheehan’s service corporation (collectively, the Sheehan defendants); and a third person. Plaintiff timely moved for leave to file an amended complaint to convert all the respondents in discovery into defendants. The court granted the motion, which had been placed on the routine motion call. Shortly thereafter,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Clark v. Brokaw HospitalAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984
- Ingle v. Hospital Sisters Health SystemAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986
- Torley v. Foster G. McGaw HospitalAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
- Browning v. Jackson Park HospitalAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987
- Andreasen v. Suburban BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988
3Cited by18 opinions
- Robinson v. Johnson Supplemental opinion upon denial of rehearing - filed March 25, 2004 - added to end of this opinionAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003
- Moomaw v. Mentor H/S, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2000
- Long v. MathewAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003
- Knapp v. BulunAppellate Court of Illinois · 2009
- Moscardini v. Neurosurg, S.C.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1994
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.