Legal Opinion

Goldman v. Isgood Stottville Realty Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 24, 1961PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

While it is the general rule “ that a transitory action, such as this, other things being equal, should be tried in the county in which the cause of action arose ” (Slavin v. Whispell, 5 A D 2d 296, 297), we are impressed by the grave physical condition of plaintiff and the sworn statement of plaintiff’s doctor that to cause plaintiff to travel to Hudson, New York, would seriously impair his health. Furthermore, no explanation is furnished as to why the four other active defendants did not join or take a position in this motion, and the “ rule is that a motion to change the place of a trial *760of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Lyman v. Gramercy ClubAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ferrigno v. General Motors Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  2. Karassik v. BereskinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API