Legal Opinion

Beyersdorff v. Spillar

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 26, 1949No. 11977PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NORVELL, Justice.

This is an appeal from an order dismissing appellant’s suit upon the sustaining of a plea in abatement.

Appellees have neither filed a brief nor submitted oral argument, consequently,, we accept as correct the statements in appellant’s brief as .to the. facts . and the record. Rule 419, Texas Rules of Civil Procedure. Headstream v. Mangum, Tex.Civ.App., 174 S.W.2d 496.

Appellant, Herman Beyersdorff, plaintiff below brought this suit for damages against B. A. Spillar, B. R. Bentley and Burton Benson, alleging that they had signed a bond which was made the basis of a writ of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Haney v. Temple Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1932
  2. Dyches v. EllisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1947
  3. Headstream v. MangumCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1943

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Texas Employers Insurance Ass'n v. BaezaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979
  2. Prairie Producing Co. v. MartensCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1986
  3. Clement v. FrantzCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1960
  4. Howell v. LoftisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1957
  5. Bailey v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1957

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API