Legal Opinion

Townsend Trust Co. v. Reynolds

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Decided November 13, 1933Published

1Opinion of the Court

The Chancellor:

The defendants demur because, they say, the complainant has a sufficient remedy at law and when such is the case this court is without jurisdiction to proceed. The language of our statute is—“Provided, that the Chancellor shall not have power to determine any matter wherein sufficient remedy may be had by common law, or Statute, before any other Court, or jurisdiction, of this State,” etc. Revised Code 1915, § 3844.

Moore v. Frame, 3 Har. 427, is cited to sustain the jurisdiction of the law courts in an action upon a lost negotiable note when the loss occurred after the note…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Fox v. WhartonCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1878
  2. Hollis v. KinneyCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1923
  3. Illinois Finance Co. v. Interstate Rural Credit Ass'nCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1917
  4. Porter v. East Jordan Realty Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Moses v. TriceSupreme Court of Virginia · 1871

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API