Legal Opinion · Dissent

Kaulia v. Honolulu Rapid Transit Co.

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided June 8, 1932No. 2027Published

1Dissent

DISSENTING OPINION OE

PARSONS, J.

I cannot concur in an interpretation of section 3608, R. L. 1925, which in effect denies to an injured workman, in the circumstances set forth in the majority opinion, his common-law right of action in tort for injury caused by the negligence of a person not his employer, because of his having claimed and having been awarded by the industrial accident board and having been paid by his employer compensation based upon a percentage of his average weekly wage, plus an allowance for medical and hospital services during a period of temporary disability.

The question,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. O'Brien v. Chicago City Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1922
  2. McKenzie v. Missouri Stables, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1930
  3. Smith v. Port Huron Gas & Electric Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Barry v. Bay State Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
  5. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railroad v. ParkerIndiana Supreme Court · 1921

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API